New Brunswick's majestic, endless Spanish morning.

Why is there a sudden influx of books revolving around [the defamation of] religious entities (or a rewriting of canon), or if the level of such stories has remained a constant, why have so many been propelled from obscurity? What is it that appeals to the masses? Religion is a very touchy subject for some. And some would despise and ridicule anything simply because it touches upon such. Such open minded individuals would probably enjoy see religions, nay, faiths explored in books seeking to rewrite and rewire them. Did that make sense? I tried to infuse as much sense as what the concept made available.

3.. 2.. 1.. Break!

Coincidentally, the two books I just read/am reading both bash/discredit Dan Brown and some of his disreputable sources. The first one talks about Secret Socities and the second is a history of physics with some nice metaphors/turns of phrase. Black Bodes and Quantum Cats by Jennifer Oullette.

I've been trying my hand at cryptics. I've actually managed a couple of clues on the ones in the weekend editions of the star. Grand Manan.